Refferal of fraud to Enforcement/Matthew Osborne Principal Legal Officer AFSA/ ITSA
I have become aware after receiving a brief of evidence AFP that the Principal Legal Officer  Mathew Osborne is  in paranoid fear that his scam of providing evidence to ITSA or now AFSA  staff  is to be exposed in court.
Matthew Osborne  has supplied a statement to the AF Police that exposing this would put his integrity at risk.
It obviously has not been apparently obvious to Mr Osbourne  that if he wished to participate in corrupt conduct and corruption then eventually someone like me would expose him.
Mr Osborne is advising that it is unnecesary to   refer  evidence of Fraud to the relevant Authorities.

(i)  referring to the Inspector-General or to relevant law enforcement authorities any evidence of an offence by the bankrupt against this Act
Mr Osborne advises that to comply with the BankruptcyAct all that is  required is a meeting with Bankruptcy Enforcement  in the particular state.
He then advises that  a  very large notation be made in the file that  a meeting has taken place but it is not a requirement to refer the matter to Enforcement for any action to be taken.
The large note in the file should mislead any inspection that the appropriate action was taken.
When I complained to Mark Findlay that Tibor Karolyi and Julie Padget had failed to  referr a Bankrupt who had committed frad on the Commonwealth and filed a false  Statement of Affairs he wrote a report covering protecting  the corrupt advice that Tibor Karolyi and Julie Padget had received from Matthew Osborne  and claimed that the Bankrupt did not have to be referred to Enforcement because  their was no money forthcoming from me as a creditor
.Section 19 (i) of the Bankruptcy Act
Clearly  it is a breach of the Bankruptcy Act not to refer fraud to Enforcement.
.
Mark Findlay is acutely aware that    he cannot use this lame excuse to protect this systemic corrupt conduct.
Matthew Osborne is also clearly aware of his responsibility as set out in the Inspector General Practice Statement.
It is also very obvious that the systemic corrupt conduct  has been allowed to flourih in this government Department because there is a failure to provide any investigation standard.
Bankruptcy Regulation has none and Adam Toma has failed to put satisfactory standards into Enforcement