Saturday 26 January 2013

Reply to freedom of Information ITSA


There is obviously very little integrity at the ITSA.
From the skanky Inspector General in Bankruptcy,Veronique Ingram attempting to mislead a senator  and with-holding evidence to Adam Toma and Annette Moodie intimidating anyone that spoke out about ITSA now I have the fucker, Dave Maher attempting to give me false information.
The Australian Government Investigation Standards applies to any Commonwealth Government Agency that does investigations. I clearly point out to the fucker Dave Maher these investigations do not have to be criminal. This fucker obviously has failed to read the AGIS.
The Commonwealth Ombudsman  and the Australian Public Service Commission have both told me they do not have to comply with these standards.
This is false. Sedgwick and Neave are both pulling their cocks!!

On friday I received my latest reply from Dave Maher FOI  the Insolvency Trustee Service Australia.
After reading this idiots  reply it was clearly obvious that he has been fucked by senior management for revealing to me that ITSA had received 9 complaints about the corrupt trustee Paul Pattison and 5 of these complaints warranted investigation and ITSA had failed to act accordingly.


I am aware ITSA are regular readers of this blog so I will post a reply to this.


Dear Mr Maher,
You clearly appear to be stupid, stupid , stupid.


First I will make it clear to you that the AGIS applies so Bankruptcy Regulation as well as Enforcement.
It appears that  only shit comes out of your mouth.


I will remind you of the contents of the AGIS


Operating framework
Standards
    1. Investigation policy
    2. Performance measures
    3. Commonwealth Policy Standards
    4. Legal framework
    5. Investigator qualifications
    6. Agency relationships
    7. Information sharing
    8. international enquiries and foreign evidence
    9. Ethic Conduct
    10. Media
      IDENIFICATION OF BREACHES AND CASE SELECTION
Introduction
Standards
    1. Receiving and recording alleged apparent or potential breaches
    2. Evaluation of referrals or conduct identified as allegedly, apparently or potentially breaching the law
    3. Accepting matters for investigation
    4. Referral to AFP
    5. Referral to Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity( ACLEI)
    6. Intelligence
      Investigation Management
      Standards
      3.1 Investigation Management
      3.2Investigation Commencement
      3.3 Planning phase
      3.4 Risk management
      3.5 Implementation phase
      3.6 Investigation closure
      3.7 Quality assurance reviews of investigations
Investigation Practices
Standards
    1. Witnesses
    2. Formal interview
    3. Search Warrants
    4. Coercive powers
    5. Physical evidence/exhibits
    6. Surveillance
    7. Human resources


I will also remind you of the first 2 opening paragraphs of the AGIS.
They read....................
The Australian Government Investigation Standards establish the minimum Standards for Australian Government Agencies conducting investigations. Where the AGIS is in conflict with the Law, legislative requirement will prevail. AGIS applies to all stages of an investigation.


An investigation is a process of seeking information relevant to an alleged, apparent or potential breach of the law involving possible judicial proceedings. The primary purpose of an investigation is to gather admissible evidence for any subsequent action, whether it be under the criminal , civil penalty civil, disciplinary or ADMINISTRATIVE sanctions. Investigations can also result in prevention and/or disruption action
I now refer to my request that I be provided with the number of complaints made against Paul Pattison in the previous 7 years prior to “resignation”
These would reveal the atrocious extent to which Bankruptcy Regulations and the National Manager Adam Toma went to to try and protect the corrupt Paul Pattison.
I understand ITSA would like me to provide them with $370 so they can retrieve this information from ITSA's data base as these are very discrete documents which ITSA is attempting to coverup.




ITSA's assumption that the FOI ACT does not require ITSA to publish on the Disclosure Log correct.   You must be STUPID, STUPID , STUPID The following is from the Attorney General's Disclosure log.
Also I also have provided you with a copy of S11c of the Freedom of Information Act 1982














Freedom of information disclosure log

Page Content

Australian Government agencies must publish on their websites details of information they release in response to freedom of information requests.
They are required to do so under Subsection 11C(3) of the Freedom of Information Act 1982.
Set out below are descriptions of information and documents we have released.
If you wish to obtain copies of these documents, email: FOI@ag.gov.au



Commonwealth Consolidated Acts

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Act] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 1982 - SECT 11C

Publication of information in accessed documents
Scope
             (1)  This section applies to information if an agency or Minister gives a person access to a document under section 11A containing the information, except in the case of any of the following:
                     (a)  personal information about any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
                     (b)  information about the business, commercial, financial or professional affairs of any person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
                     (c)  other information of a kind determined by the Information Commissioner under subsection (2), if it would be unreasonable to publish the information;
                     (d)  any information, if it is not reasonably practicable to publish the information under this section because of the extent of any modifications to a document (or documents) necessary to delete information mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (c).
             (2)  The Information Commissioner may, by legislative instrument, make a determination for the purposes of paragraph (1)(c).
Publication
             (3)  The agency, or the Minister, must publish the information to members of the public generally on a website by:
                     (a)  making the information available for downloading from the website; or
                     (b)  publishing on the website a link to another website, from which the information can be downloaded; or
                     (c)  publishing on the website other details of how the information may be obtained.
             (4)  The agency may impose a charge on a person for accessing the information only if:
                     (a)  the person does not directly access the information by downloading it from the website (or another website); and
                     (b)  the charge is to reimburse the agency for a specific reproduction cost, or other specific incidental costs, incurred in giving the person access to that particular information.
             (5)  If there is a charge for accessing the information, the agency or Minister must publish details of the charge in the same way as the information is published under this section.
Time limit for publication
             (6)  The agency or Minister must comply with this section within 10 working days after the day the person is given access to the document.
             (7)  In this section:
"working day" means a day that is not:
                     (a)  a Saturday; or
                     (b)  a Sunday; or
                     (c)  a public holiday in the place where the function of publishing the information under this section is to be performed.











Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)